Ahmed Zamen, 43, try implicated of a total of five counts including rape. A jury heard how their alleged victim gave up trying to fight because she ‘couldn’t place him down’

• 18:02, 26 JAN 2021

A guy lured a Tinder go out to their residence and raped the lady despite their saying no “at minimum 20 times”, a courtroom has heard.

Ahmed Zamen, 43, declines raping the woman at his flat in Cardiff a year ago, claiming the alleged sufferer came to their land and engaged in intercourse voluntarily.

The offence is purported to have chosen to take place on defendant’s residence in Cathays in which the pair met the very first time. The complainant will not deny that she knowingly visited Zamen’s homes but said that she would not permission to their sexual advances.

Zamen try accused of two matters of sexual attack, certainly one of attempted rape, certainly one of assault by entrance, and one of rape. The guy declines all counts.

The legal read that after leaving their house the complainant – who’s got automated lifelong privacy – called the authorities and Zamen had been arrested listed here day.

Mr Griffiths demonstrated your alleged victim failed to understand how to get to the club therefore requested the postcode to which Zamen responded together with his very own postcode.

Following alleged sufferer stated this obvious mistake Zamen re-sent the same postcode and proposed she park at their home, in Cogan Terrace, plus they could go into the club.

She arranged and after arriving had been asked in to the home. The two spoken plus the alleged sufferer said she got one glass of h2o and also the defendant drank orange juice.

In a video clip interview starred toward courtroom the complainant said although she noticed uncomfortable for the residential property she consented to those activities.

Mr Griffiths alleged that the defendant subsequently made an effort to feeling within the woman’s www.hookupdates.net/escort/sandy-springs top to which she stated: “No”. Really then alleged which he began sense the top of this lady thighs through this lady pants and raised the girl top to hug the girl boobs.

Furthermore alleged that while on the sofa the defendant placed the complainant’s give inside his undies to touch his genitals.

Explaining the alleged event in her own videos meeting, the complainant mentioned she “sunk inside sofa and tried to push out” making it clear she ended up being unpleasant through the incident.

The legal heard how defendant after that taken the lady into a located place and transferred to the bedroom where the guy unclothed down to his underwear.

When expected why she performedn’t try and set the house or property at this time she mentioned she “didn’t know”. She stated she had been unwilling to enter the rooms and was actually “wary of in which he wanted to go on it” but said she was not taken around by power. The defendant next undressed down to their undergarments whilst complainant stayed totally clothed.

As soon as within the bedroom it’s alleged that the defendant sexually assaulted the complainant as well as raped the girl.

In videos meeting starred on the judge the complainant said she have stated “no at the very least 20 instances” and quit trying to fight back because she “couldn’t place your off” and isn’t “strong enough”.

She said by the point Zamen started initially to rape her she “didn’t understand aim of saying no any longer” and that the guy “was planning manage exactly what the guy wanted to carry out anyway”.

The alleged prey next stated within the interview the defendant telephoned a friend to arrange conference up for items. Shortly after both the alleged sufferer and Zamen kept the flat and parted means.

She telephoned a friend detailing exactly what had occurred and went to two pharmacies in search of the morning after product. Later on that night she reported the incident to authorities.

In cross-examination protection barrister Nick Gedge questioned the alleged sufferer on her behalf statement on “looking for a way out” although the so-called attack took place the sack.

Mr Gedge mentioned: “Had your maybe not looked-for an easy method out before this?” and labeled the tour of this dull the complainant have got on arrival.

She described that she decided not to suggest an actual “way out” but rather meant to eliminate by herself emotionally from condition.

The protection in addition questioned precisely why the alleged target hadn’t tried to leave the situation following event in the lounge. Mr Gedge stated: “the reason why performedn’t pay a visit to the bathroom? This could be a standard thing for a lady to accomplish currently. Did you always the sack as you sensed comfortable until now?”

The complainant answered that while she is uncomfortable aided by the incident in the lounge she had no interest of what can continue to happen.

The defence furthermore regarded texting amongst the defendant in addition to complainant within the day before the set appointment in-person.

In a WhatsApp conversation in the mid-day of the day they fulfilled the judge heard exactly how a message from defendant read: “If we have on we can cool at mine” plus “If we get lured I’ve had gotten drink at my own.”

The court then heard the alleged target answered: “Doesn’t mean I’m agreeing to certainly not I’m not claiming no also.”

Mr Gedge proposed the two had intercourse in the property but the complainant had been “fully interested and consenting”. He furthermore advised the complainant was actually let down that Zamen slice the evening short by organizing to generally meet a buddy hence the complainant “regretted” sex together with the defendant. The alleged target disputed many of these pointers.

Zamen denies all five counts in addition to test goes on.