This post identifies the introduction of the relationship Intimacy Collection (RCI), and that draws to your conceptualization regarding closeness given that high interdependence anywhere between several people’s things recommended by the Kelley et al. (1983). The current “closest” relationship of individuals (Letter = 241) drawn on the pupil populace supported while the cause for RCI development, with the closest relationships located to help you include multiple dating brands, along with romantic, buddy, and members of the family dating. The growth and psychometric services of one’s three RCI subscales (Frequency, Range, Strength), its rating, and their consolidation to make a total index of closeness is explained. The fresh RCI’s attempt-retest precision try reported and also the organization between RCI get and you can this new lifetime of the partnership are chatted about. RCI results having individuals’ closest relationships was compared to people out-of not-close dating, so you’re able to a subjective intimacy directory, in order to several strategies regarding relationships connect with, as well as Rubin’s (1973) Preference and you can Loving balances. Ultimately, the skill of the brand new RCI in order to predict dating breakup try compared to that of your own Personal Intimacy Index, a catalog of your emotional tone of one’s dating, in order to relationship toughness. It’s figured brand new RCI and has now acceptable internal and you can test-retest precision, sufficient discriminant and construct validity, and you may promising predictive legitimacy, ergo suggesting which comprises a feasible a style of assessing relationships closeness.

Fingerprint

• Gizmos and you may Provides Treatments Existence Sciences a hundred%

Mention it

• APA
• Important
• Harvard
• Vancouver
• Writer
• BIBTEX
• RIS

N2 – This article describes the introduction of the connection Closeness Directory (RCI), and that brings to the conceptualization away from closeness since higher interdependence ranging from a couple man’s items recommended because of the Kelley mais aussi al. (1983). The present day “closest” matchmaking of men and women (N = 241) pulled on scholar people supported as basis for RCI innovation, for the closest dating found to include numerous relationship designs, also intimate, friend, and you can family relations dating. The organization and you may psychometric functions of your own around three RCI subscales (Frequency, Diversity, Strength), their scoring, in addition to their integration to form a total directory regarding intimacy is actually revealed. The fresh new RCI’s test-retest reliability are claimed in addition to connection between RCI get and this new longevity of the connection is chatted about. RCI ratings to own individuals’ closest relationships is compared to those out-of not-intimate matchmaking, in order to a personal intimacy list, and also to numerous measures out-of relationships connect with, plus Rubin’s (1973) Liking and you can Loving bills. Finally, the ability of the brand new RCI so you can assume relationships break up is actually contrasted compared to that of one’s Subjective Intimacy Index, a directory of one’s psychological build of relationship, in order to dating durability. It is concluded that new RCI and also acceptable inner and you may test-retest precision, satisfactory discriminant and build validity, and you will promising predictive validity, therefore suggesting this comprises a practical a style of assessing relationships closeness.

Abdominal – This article identifies the development of the relationship Intimacy List (RCI), and therefore pulls into conceptualization off closeness as the large interdependence ranging from one or two mans items advised because of the Kelley et al. (1983). The present day “closest” dating of people (Letter = 241) drawn regarding scholar population offered since the basis for RCI advancement, on the nearest matchmaking found to encompass several relationships products, including personal, buddy, and members of the family relationships. The development and you can psychometric features of your own around three RCI subscales (Frequency, Variety, Strength), its rating, and their integration to make an overall total directory off closeness try explained. The newest RCI’s decide to try-retest precision are stated and the association anywhere between RCI get and you may this new lifetime of the partnership was chatted about. RCI results to own individuals’ closest relationship are compared to people out-of not-intimate dating, so you’re able to a personal intimacy index, in order to numerous steps from relationship connect with, together with Rubin’s (1973) Liking and you can Enjoying balances. Eventually, the art of the latest RCI to help you expect relationships separation are in comparison to that particular of your Personal Intimacy Directory, an inventory of mental tone of your own relationships, and also to matchmaking durability. It is determined that this new RCI and has acceptable internal and take to-retest precision, sufficient discriminant and build legitimacy, and encouraging predictive authenticity, thus recommending it comprises a feasible means of examining relationship closeness.