UTF-16 isn’t necessarily 2 bytes wider
“Kun” is even put a bit more and i am a bit specific about that. I don’t found it utilized anywhere near this much on the/in order to women subjects “”Perhaps”” a bit less used by women speakers as well.
Now a whole lot more the important dilemma of Sai’s label: The new no-particle has been used shortly after surnames, yes. Now i’m only animefan that is learning a bit of Japanese, but wouldn’t which means that that you will next build it as “surname”+”no”+”considering identity”? I have seen a number of subtitled attacks of one’s cartoon, there it create Fujiwara zero Sai, just like the apposed to the manga during the toriyamaworld, in which they generate Fujiwarano Sai. Would be the fact as animetranslators believed the name is actually “Sai from Fujiwara” and mangatranslators knew that it is Fujiwarano Sai?
Speaking of titled surrogate pairs
‘Fujiwara’ is the surname. Title is so “Sai away from Fujiwara” in the same manner one to “Ronald McDonald” is “Ronald out-of Donald”. Japan habit of getting surnames first really works harmoniously to the Japanese sentence structure (post-positions in place of prepositions) in cases like this. Running “Fujiwarano” together with her that way was an attempt to improve identity browse “normal”, I assume – in order that “no” is not interpreted as the specific odd version of center very first or something like that. Equivalent possibly to help you placing “Jeanne d’Arc” instead of “Jeanne de Arch”.
Sai’s name is according to diving, tv-tokyo and you will facility pierrot . As i appeared it for the a great dictionary (edict) the end result try two brands. Also Fujiwara, and also Fujiwarano
BTW. ‘s the best possible way to enter blogs from inside the Japanese right here that IE-specific procedure where you create this new unicode-number? (that we do not know the hell their supposed to fool around with)
HTML reputation entities to possess Unicode commonly Web browser-particular. Brand new security inside regular HTML supply turns out &# ;, where in fact the reputation number range doing 65,535. (Unicode is consistently 16-bits broad, except which have UTF-8 and therefore spends a kind 420 dating site of Huffman-coding program in order to show prominent characters – ASCII 0 courtesy 127, actually – in a single byte at the expense of having fun with around three for most other people.) From inside the Wiki supply right here, you could potentially (now) simply include people entities truly. (Italicized statements of Karl Knechtel)
This is a common misconception about 16-bit Unicode. Occasionally characters are 4 bytes wide. They make UTF-16 just as cumbersome as UTF-8. (Italicized comments from David Take a look?)
mdm: Various other fool around with to have -sama would be okage-sama (engl.: of use people) such as the expression okage-sama de- (engl.: as a result of you; observe that your listed here is an incorrect interpretation. Another person proven to each other presenter and listener could well be intended.) The cause of playing with -sama right here, In my opinion, is always to say thank you.
ShinGensou: The expression ‘senpai’ is not personal to help you men. It is utilized by ladies towards the other lady as well. It’s a beneficial deferential label, accepting that topic are off a high updates than just your – constantly regarding long-time out of contribution when you look at the a pub, providers or other prepared organization.
Jhereg: I’ve a question. You will find usually titled my personal grandma O-ba-chan. You’ve got said that ‘chan’ can be used for kids. If this sounds like thus, as to the reasons in the morning I using ‘chan’ when refering to my grandma?
kokiri chan was a flaccid identity and can be taken when you look at the an informal means – their grandmother could well be a good example unless you’re inside a good instance traditional friends. You will find men family relations that happen to be always titled, e.g. take-chan and if I was indeed chatting up a lady inside her 20’s, I might likely telephone call this lady ne-chan; too amicable? – maybe but sexist, not.