Initial comparison of descriptive statistics for all clinical variables was performed using either analysis of variance or chi-squared tests, depending on whether the variables were quantitative or categorical. To allow comparison among studies, the ARCS scores were then standardized (to Z scores) using the mean and SD of the normal population reported by Schofield et al. 21 Bivariate linear correlation analysis of standardized ARCS scores was performed using Pearson’s (r) coefficient tests. Because moderate outliers were observed for some of the cognitive variables, we performed a secondary check of the Pearson’s correlation analyses by using Spearman’s (rho) tests, which are robust to outlier effects. These tests yielded results showing consistent strength and significance for all bivariate tests, thus adding confidence that the Pearson’s (r) results were not affected by outliers. For each regression model, we entered each of the mental health measures as the main effect factors so as to approximate the relative contribution of each mental health factor on cognitive function while accounting for the others. Tests for normality of outcome variables were performed using Q-Q plots and Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit tests. These tests showed some modest deviations from https://datingranking.net/single-parent-dating/ normality for language and visual domains, but these were not deemed substantial enough to warrant transformation. e., sex, age at initial assessment, age at diagnosis, disease duration, EDSS, treatment type, MS subtype, annual relapse rate, other mental health medications, and education level. To account for multicolinearity, and so as not to overburden each regression model with too many uninformative parameters, we chose to include all main effect factors and covariates in a step-wise fashion using an algorithm that only retained covariates if they contributed to the overall regression model (p<0.05). In an effort to discern the relative association of the three mood indices from each other, and in relation to the other clinical covariates, we partitioned our regression models to include forced entry of each mood index separately, with all other clinical covariates entered in a step-wise fashion, and forced entry of all three mood indices combined, with all other clinical covariates entered in a step-wise fashion. Because we tested six different hypotheses (i.e., six cognitive function outcomes), we used the Bonferroni correction method to adjust the significance level to 0.008 (i.e., 0.05/6). In addition, we retained results at the “suggestive” level of 0.05 to provide an indication of association trends.
Show
Brand new detailed qualities with the MS subtypes are offered during the Table step one. Seventy-nine percent of our own cohort had been categorized because the relapsing remitting (RRMS), 14% have been secondary modern (SPMS), and you may eight% priS) MS. Customers searching MS-specific immunomodulatory providers have been mostly RRMS clients and was in fact getting interferon beta (N=89), glatiramer acetate (N=42), natalizumab (N=25), fingolimod (N=9), dimethyl fumarate (N=4), or no MS immunomodulatory medication (N=153) in the course of doing the study examination. SPMS people were more mature, had an extended lifetime of situation, and had a top EDSS height than simply its RRMS alternatives at the full time of your own examination. With the seriousness progressing conditions for each and every feeling directory to your DASS, 24 the severity of emotional episodes was analyzed. In our MS cohort, 12% regarding people claimed big or extremely significant anxiety, which have 14% rating average levels of anxiety (Figure step 1). Thirty-1 percent was indeed undergoing treatment with good serotonin reuptake inhibitor on the time out of starting intellectual analysis. Predicated on the definition of intellectual handicap (see over), 34% of our MS cohort have been cognitively impaired.
We and integrated enough possibly important covariates during the each of your own regression activities, we
Shape 1. Delivery out of Aura Indices regarding the Several Sclerosis (MS) Cohort Proving Proportions of Patients at every Level of Severity a good
