Rosenfeld, Meters. J. (2010, April). Meeting on the web: An upswing of the Websites because a social mediator. Demonstration on Population Connection out-of The united states Group meetings, Dallas, Tx. [ Backlinks ]
Shtatfeld, Roentgen., & Barak, A beneficial. (2009). Items associated with unveiling social associations into Adult dating sites: A viewpoint on public replace theory. Interpersona: A major international Log on Private Relationship, step three, 19-37. [ Website links ]
Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2010). Just who relationships exactly who? Educational homophily for the online partner options. European Sociological Feedback. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998a). Insiders’ views with the reasons for having interest so you’re able to a virtually almost every other. Public Psychology Quarterly, 61, 287-300. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998b). Exactly what features married lovers attracted to both? Free Query in Creative Sociology, twenty-six, 193-200. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of seen correspondence to own personal and you will friendship appeal sense while in the a rating-acquainted time. Identity and you can Public Psychology Bulletin, 20, 391400. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). Brand new determine from mothers and you will relatives to the quality and you will balance regarding personal matchmaking: A good around three-revolution longitudinal analysis. Record out of ily, 54, 888-900. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Intimate partners’ attitudes from social networking services toward passage of some time relationship transitions. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, Meters. C. (2002). Social networking sites and alter during the individual dating. For the A. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & Meters. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in the Relationships (pp. 257-284). Cambridge: Cambridge College or university Press. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Taste some things (in a few somebody) more than anybody else: Lover needs during the romantic relationship and you may friendships. Journal regarding Societal and personal Relationships, 19, 463-481. [ Website links ]
Personal Relationships, seven, 325-340
Sprecher, S., Schwartz, P., Harvey, J., & Hatfield, E. (2008). In the S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Guide out of relationship initiation (pp. 249-265). Nyc: Psychology Drive/Taylor & Francis. [ Website links ]
Straaten, I., Engles, Roentgen. C. Yards. E., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, Roentgen. W. (2009). Appointment their matches: Just how elegance resemblance impacts means behavior inside the combined-sex dyads. Personality and you may Personal Mindset Bulletin, 35, 685-697. [ Website links ]
Sunnafrank, Yards., & Miller, G. R. (1981). New character off initial talks inside the deciding appeal to help you equivalent and you will unlike complete strangers. Peoples Communication Browse, 8, 16-25. [ Links ]
Sunnafrank, Meters., & Ramirez, An effective. (2004). At first: Chronic relational results of get-acquainted with discussions. Log out-of Societal and private Relationships, 21, 361-379. [ Links ]
Tenny, E. R., Turkheimer, Age., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Being enjoyed is more than with good identification: The character out-of complimentary. Diary out of Look in Personality, 43, 479-585. [ Website links ]
Vangelisti, An effective. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (2006). The latest Cambridge manual off personal relationship. Cambridge University Push. [ Backlinks ]
Thebusinessoflove: Relationships initiation in the Internet matchmaking Polska kvinnor functions
Walster, G.,W., Hatfield, Elizabeth., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Dependence on physical attractiveness for the relationship conclusion. Diary of Character and you can Societal Therapy, cuatro, 508-516. [ Links ]
Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A great., Simms, Elizabeth Letter., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Meets brands and package breakers: Analyses off assortative mating from inside the newlywed partners. Journal regarding Identity, 72, 1029-1068. [ Links ]
Whisman, Yards. Good., Coastline, S. Roentgen. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Are relationship discord taxonic and can taxonic status become examined reliably? Comes from a nationwide, user take to out of maried people. Log off Asking and you will Health-related Mindset, 76, 745-755. [ Hyperlinks ]
