Defendant Viado submitted their Answer about significantly more than-called cases. In the two cases the guy admits the reality that regarding the filing of your own Petition to the Issuance of brand new owner’s duplicates of TCT No. T-14466 and 14467, however, denies with caused the performance away from a different sort of power from attorney having as well as in account of owners. The guy mentioned that it absolutely was Marilou Soriano just who given so you’re able to him a prepared petition which have annexes on that having him so you can signal and you can thereafter to possess their unique retained the advice in order to document inside the courtroom. That it arrangement are said by the Marilou Soriano and Viado have concurred on condition that Marilou Soriano presented to him plaintiff Jacinto Soriano, then on a controls settee, exactly who she introduced as the his dad. Additionally Viado offered to help in reconstituting the lost titles to possess a charge out of P80,. Viado claims which he was just entitled from the Special Fuel from Lawyer that has been already notarized and you may connected to the Petition, x x x.
Just after summons by guide, defendants Jose into the Civil Instance No. 6210-Roentgen and you may Hufana in Civil Circumstances Zero. 6211-R don’t document their respective responses. Up on motion of the plaintiffs, Jose and you will Hufana have been .
This new said mortgage are secured of the a real home financial more new TCT Zero
With its Respond to inside the Civil Case No. 6211-R, duly registered timely, BPI acknowledges paragraphs step 1 and you will 8 of your Complaint and denies other issue allegations regarding the Complaint. Part eight, pertains to brand new plaintiffs assertion that the Petition into the issuance of new customer’s duplicate copy out-of TCT Nos. T-14466 and you can T-14467 could have been provided hence an order was given saying that customer’s duplicate of the foregoing headings was in fact missing and no force and you can feeling. 14466 that have BPI regarding the level of A few Billion Pesos. Owing to affirmative protections. BPI slates that it has taken care of Hufana completely good believe, and thus, it is a good mortgagee from inside the good faith permitted the security within the law. Then, it claims that it is not necessary going outside of the four comers away from Hufana’s title, and therefore to the the deal with reveals zero defect. The borrowed funds files are notarized files and therefore, in legislation, are entitled to strong expectation off regularity and you may authenticity.
Upon actions out of plaintiffs properly granted from the court, an amended Criticism is submitted by plaintiffs impleading Maria Luzviminda Patimo as the offender from inside the Municipal Circumstances No. 6210-R.
Within the Treatment for the brand East Village pay day loan alternatives new Revised Complaint, offender Patimo denies the materials accusations from the Revised Problem. Once the Unique and you may Affirmative Defenses, Patimo so-called that since , she was approached by the offender Jose just who required financing and considering since the guarantee TCT Zero. 85840. In advance of entering the said loan application out-of Jose, Patimo decided to go to verify and check the above-said title on the Sign in off Deeds of Baguio Area. 85840.
Met that there no burden or other liens on the label offered by Jose, Patimo provided the borrowed funds applied for by the Jose regarding the amount of a single Million Peso
Within the Municipal Case No. 6210-R, the fact are hereby ignored regarding offender Patimo having use up all your from quality. At the time of defendants Jose and Viado, he is hereby ordered so you’re able to solidarity afford the plaintiffs the quantity of one mil pesos due to the fact and also by way of real damage; three hundred thousand pesos compliment of ethical damages; two hundred thousand pesos as and by way of excellent damage; and you can 25 [sic] thousand pesos given that attorney’s fees and also to afford the cost of the fit.
