Research Top quality Comparison

New imply data high quality get along side 41 articles conference addition conditions is 6.2 (eTables step 1 and you will 2 throughout the Enhance). Several education (4.9%) dropped about reasonable-top quality variety, and you will 10 knowledge (twenty-four.4%) was indeed regarding average-top quality variety, towards the leftover 30 training (70.7%) from the large-high quality range. The 2 degree deemed to own low methodological high quality was in fact got rid of from analyses. Therefore, the rest 39 studies were chosen for then meta-analyses.

Try Attributes off Provided Degree

All in all, 39 degree met all studies and methodological introduction requirements. Knowledge have been readily available for delivering (n = 34), choosing (n = 20), forwarding instead of agree (n = 5), otherwise that have a good sext sent without concur (n = 4). This new Dining table summarizes provided knowledge. As a whole over the 39 degree, 110 380 members had been provided, that have an indicate age of decades (a long time, eleven.9-17.0 years). Normally, 47.2% of members was basically male. Twenty-a couple of knowledge (56.4%) was about Us, several training (29.8%) were out-of Europe, dos education (5.1%) was indeed out-of Australia, step 1 studies (2.6%) was away from Canada, step one investigation (dos.6%) was out-of South Africa (2.6%), and you can step 1 investigation (2.6%) are from Southern Korea. To try to get education (46.2%) checked sexting having fun with smartphones and you will computers, which have 6 knowledge (fifteen.4%) having fun with hosts merely, fourteen training (thirty-five.9%) thru smartphones just, and one investigation (dos.6%) bringing insufficient recommendations to possess commitment. 11 degree (twenty eight.2%) requested users regarding sexting thru photos, fourteen training (thirty-five.9%) through photo or movies, eight education (17.9%) through pictures and you will/or explicit messages, and you can eight education (17.9%) via photo, clips, and/or explicit texts. Fundamentally, 30 knowledge (79.5%) was authored inside the peer-analyzed journals, and 8 knowledge (20.5%) have been unpublished.

Table.

Abbreviations: One another, investigation centers around sexting via possibly a mobile device and/or internet; FW-P, study focuses on whether participants mutual others’ sexts as opposed to the concur; FW-V, investigation centers around whether or not participants got sexts distributed to someone else without their concur; M, intimately explicit texts; Cellular, investigation focuses primarily on sexting thru smart phones; NCPTUP, Federal Venture to quit Teenager and you may Unplanned Maternity; On line, data centers on sexting online; P, pictures; R, data concentrates on receiving messages; S, studies centers on giving messages; Unspecified, investigation cannot offer adequate suggestions to search for the function of sexting; V, movies.

Shared Prevalence away from Sending an excellent Sext

The random-effects analysis of the 34 studies on sending a sext yielded a mean prevalence of 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) ( Figure 2 ). The Egger test provided evidence that studies with smaller sample sizes had more extreme prevalence estimates (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the presence of potential outliers, and one study was identified. Heterogeneity of effect sizes remained present with (Q = , P < .001,>

Tree Area of Impression Types for each and every Investigation Used in this new Meta-research to the Frequency off Delivering a Sext

Shown was a tree plot away from degree included in the meta-study. The overall bottom line guess getting sending a sext try fourteen.8% (95% CI, a dozen.8%-16.8%). NCPTUP suggests Federal Promotion to stop Teenager and you may Unexpected Pregnancy.

A great meta-regression investigation revealed an excellent linear upsurge in prevalence just like the years improved (b = 0.037; 95% CI, 0.024-0.050). Effect sizes was basically and additionally moderated from the seasons off data analysis collection, which have a showed boost in the brand new frequency regarding delivering a good sext through the years (b = 0.026; 95% CI, 0.012-0.039). Chatting outlet and informed me anywhere between-data variability, with a higher incidence off sexting with the mobile phones (k = 13; 13.4%; 95% CI, 9.0%-17.7%) compared to hosts (k mejor lugar para conocer mujeres tailandesas = 4; 5.5%; 95% CI, 2.3%-8.6%), where k means the number of education. Prevalence wasn’t moderated because of the sex, geographic area, message stuff, otherwise publication status.